Corruption within policing institutions undermines public trust, weakens the rule of law, and compromises effective service delivery. This study explores a systematic, multi-dimensional approach to combating corruption and restoring legitimacy in policing, with particular reference to the South African context. Drawing on institutional theory, procedural justice, and governance frameworks, the paper analyses the structural and behavioural drivers of corruption within police organisations. A mixed-methods approach is adopted, combining qualitative insights from policy analysis and case studies with quantitative data from public perception surveys. The findings suggest that sustainable reform requires integrated interventions, including ethical leadership, strengthened accountability mechanisms, community participation, and the strategic use of technology. The study concludes that restoring legitimacy is not solely dependent on reducing corruption but on rebuilding trust through transparency, fairness, and consistent professional conduct. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a systematic approach in combating corruption within policing institutions and to evaluate how such an approach contributes to restoring public legitimacy and trust in law enforcement agencies. Problem Statement Police corruption remains a persistent and systemic challenge, particularly in developing contexts such as South Africa. Despite numerous reforms, allegations of bribery, abuse of power, evidence tampering, and collusion with criminal networks continue to erode public confidence in the police. This lack of trust negatively affects community cooperation, crime reporting, and overall policing effectiveness. Existing anti-corruption measures are often fragmented, reactive, and poorly coordinated, resulting in limited long-term impact. Therefore, there is a need for a coherent, systematic framework that addresses both institutional weaknesses and behavioural factors contributing to corruption while simultaneously restoring police legitimacy. Methodology (Systematic Approach) The study adopts a mixed-methods research design structured around a systematic reform framework. Qualitative Component Policy and legislative analysis (e.g., anti-corruption frameworks, policing policies). Case studies of corruption incidents and reform initiatives. Semi-structured interviews with police officials, oversight bodies, and community stakeholders. Quantitative Component. Analysis of public perception surveys on trust and legitimacy. Review of corruption statistics and disciplinary records within policing institutions. Systematic Approach Framework. The study applies a multi-level intervention model focusing on Institutional Reform (policy, oversight, internal controls). Accountability and Transparency Mechanisms. Community Engagement and Co-production of Safety. Technology and Data-Driven Policing (e.g., digital forensics, monitoring systems). Corruption in policing is both structural and cultural, requiring more than punitive measures. Weak accountability systems and poor leadership significantly contribute to unethical practices. Public trust is strongly linked to procedural justice, fairness, and respectful treatment by police officers. Community participation enhances oversight and reduces opportunities for corruption. The use of technology (e.g., body cameras, digital evidence systems) improves transparency but must be supported by strong governance. Fragmented anti-corruption strategies are less effective compared to integrated, systemwide approaches. Combating corruption in policing requires a holistic and systematic approach that addresses institutional deficiencies, promotes ethical leadership, and strengthens accountability mechanisms. Restoring legitimacy goes beyond enforcement it demands a transformation in organisational culture, consistent adherence to procedural justice, and active community involvement. Sustainable reform can only be achieved when anti-corruption strategies are integrated, well-coordinated, and supported by political will and public participation. The study recommends the institutionalisation of continuous monitoring, capacity building, and collaborative governance as key pillars for long-term success.